Skip to main content

Haavara Agreement: The Zionists, Nazis and the Soviets

 On 25 August 1933, bourgeoise Jews who were part of Zionist German Jews held a talk with Nazis and reached an agreement - Haavara Agreement. It means transfer agreement. It was a major factor in making possible the migration of approximately 60,000 German Jews to Palestine in 1933–1939. This is a lesser-known fact.



The agreement enabled rich Jews fleeing persecution under the new Nazi regime to transfer some portion of their assets to British Mandatory Palestine. Emigrants sold their assets in Germany to pay for essential goods (manufactured in Germany) to be shipped to Mandatory Palestine. This pact between Nazis and rich jews was so controversial that it was opposed by Jewish leaders within and outside the Zionist movement itself.


For rich jews in Germany, the agreement offered a way to leave an increasingly hostile environment in Germany; for the Yishuv, the new Jewish community in Palestine, it offered access to both immigrant labour and economic support; for the Germans, it facilitated the emigration of German Jews while breaking the anti-Nazi boycott of 1933, which had mass support among European Jews and was thought by the German state to be a potential threat to the German economy. 

(Francis R. Nicosia -The Third Reich & the Palestine question)


Events leading to Haavara Agreement


In the Reichstag general elections of 1932, the Nazi party got great shares of votes but they didn't have a majority to form a stable government. The coalition government fell, Under pressure from politicians, industrialists and others, President Paul von Hindenburg appointed Hitler as Chancellor of Germany on 30 January 1933. This event is popularly known as - seizure of power. In few months, except for churches and the army, everything was under their control.


it was during this time Nazi coalition started looking at answering the "Jewish question" - they encouraged expulsion and the encouragement of voluntary emigration of jews. Widespread civil persecution of German Jews began. Meanwhile, in Mandatory Palestine, a growing Jewish population (174,610 in 1931, rising to 384,078 in 1936) was acquiring land and developing the structures of a future Jewish state (Israel) despite opposition from the native population. 


The discriminative immigration


Under the agreement, Jews emigrating from Germany could use their assets to purchase German-manufactured goods for export, thus salvaging their personal assets during emigration. This provided a substantial export market for both nazi Germany and British Palestine. By the time the program ended with the start of WW2, the total had risen to more than half a billion USD (by today's worth).


Emigrants with a capital of 10000 pounds (roughly INR 59 Lakh today)could move to Palestine despite severe British restrictions on Jewish immigration under an immigrant investor program similar to the modern EB-5 visa. Yes, the allies did know about Jewish persecution in Germany and remained silent on it. Initially, Hitler seemed indifferent to the economic details of the plan, but he supported it in the period from September 1937 to 1939 - because it involves a lot of money! 


Fall of the Soviet Union and Exodus of Russian Jews


When the Soviet Union began to collapse, American immigration policy prevented a large number of Russian Jews from coming to the United States. Instead, they chose Israel because of liberal immigration laws. Anyone with Jewish grandparents on either of their parents' side was considered jew. Between 1990 and 1997, more than 710,000 Soviet immigrants landed in the country, boosting the working-age population by 15 percent. Around 60 percent of the new arrivals had a college education, versus 30 to 40 percent of the native population. Immigration, in general, is good for growth. When those immigrants are engineers, managers, and college professors, it's even better for growth. The Russian influx gave Israel a booster shot of both bodies and brains. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Revisiting Malabar rebellion of 1921

The what, why and how of Malabar Rebellion and it's aftermath. Malabar rebellion is one of the most misinterpreted peasant uprising in the country. The hindutwa forces tries to demonize the rebels. Where islamic fundamentalists sees it a movement to establish Sunni Islamic state. But the studies confirm both were absolutely wrong. Events leading to Malabar rebellion of 1921? Tipu Sultan's regin (1793-1762) after the invasion of Malabar (present day Palakkad, Kozhikode, Malappuram and parts of Kannur) many Jenmis (landlords) were displaced or was under refuge of neighbouring states. Those who didn't runaway converted to Islam for mercy and appeasement. But Tipu altogether abolished the Janmi system and introduced new taxation by which the government bodies have fixed share based on produce unlike before. Also massive land reforms and cultural reforms were introduced such as covering the breasts was made mandatory by law being one of them.  This ensured well-being...

Squid Game: Through Marxist perspective

  “Everyone here has insurmountably large loans and stands at the precipice of life, Do you want to go home and live the rest of your life like garbage, being chased by creditors? Or do you want to grab this last opportunity, which we are presenting?” - an anonymous game organizer in a mask and pink uniform tells the assembled players in the first episode. The hit Korean show “Squid Game,” where working-class contestants are given a chance to win billions, or literally die trying. It also breathes life to an allegory of capitalism rooted in the alienation of the working class. Also, it never makes its action look glamorous. Squid Game is directed by Hwang Dong-hyuk. The core theme of the series is a group of contesters getting into battle royale style games to win prize money. The show tries to tell us how humans show their true nature when put in extreme situations. on the other hand, it also shows participants actualizing their most human powers — solidarity, tenderness, and empa...

5 myths about Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK)

1.  DPRK men are forced to have the same haircut / banned from having the same haircut as Kim Jong Un Back in 2014 the BBC and other news outlets wrote an article on  North Korean university students ordered to have Kim Jong Un’s haircut . It was with no surprise that the quirkiness and obscureness of the topic help spread this rumour like a wildfire on the internet with all sorts of memes coming out of the woodwork. Tourists travelling in North Korea at the time quickly debunked this which numerous mainstream newspapers were backing their stories from an unknown source within the DPRK.  2. Only elites and military personnel are allowed to have vehicles so traffic is non-existent! Prior to 2010 traffic in North Korea was incredibly low. There used to be few taxis, a handful of vans & trucks, and lots of busses back then. Demand for taxis grew as public transport infrastructure is lacking, and as the local economy grew – so does the number of drivers! Although traffic ...